Jessica Entwistle
February 18 2026
Today’s security discussions focus on practical implementation of Zero Trust principles, the role of segmentation in limiting lateral movement, and the importance of continuously validating access decisions.
As perimeter-based models evolve, internal visibility becomes more important than ever.
Security analysis shows organisations are increasingly moving beyond discussion and into practical implementation of Zero Trust principles. This includes stricter identity verification, device validation, and contextual access controls.
However, implementation maturity varies significantly.
Why it matters
Zero Trust is not a product but an approach. Clear strategy and phased validation help ensure practical, measurable improvement.
Source: Security architecture commentary
Recent reporting highlights that network segmentation continues to play a critical role in limiting the spread of intrusions. Without effective segmentation, small breaches can escalate rapidly.
Many environments still rely on broad internal trust assumptions.
Why it matters
Segmentation limits lateral movement and reduces operational impact if a compromise occurs.
Source: Network security research
Security teams are placing greater emphasis on validating access continuously rather than relying solely on initial authentication. Behavioural monitoring and conditional access policies are becoming more common.
Why it matters
Access decisions should reflect current risk, not just past authentication. Continuous validation strengthens overall resilience.
Source: Identity and architecture reporting
Security maturity evolves as architecture evolves. By strengthening segmentation, validating access decisions, and testing internal trust assumptions, organisations can reduce the likelihood and impact of compromise while enabling secure growth.
If you would like support assessing segmentation or validating Zero Trust controls, speak to the Secarma team:
https://secarma.com/contact